Pages

Español

Español

Monday, November 16, 2015

Royal Condolences

 
His Majesty the King of Spain signs his condolences

 

“France’s pain is Spain’s; the pain of the French is the pain of the Spaniards. We are with the French people always, for peace, liberty, democracy, and against terrorism. All of our affection and solidarity, in special for the city of Paris and for the victims and their families of yesterday’s abominable attacks.”

 

Friday, November 13, 2015

Paris shootings and bombings


In solidarity with the victims of heathen Islamism in Paris, France, killed in today’s horrid attacks. Pray for the souls of all murdered innocents at the hands of the Mahometans, and that Our Lord may welcome them into His glory.


Wednesday, October 28, 2015

And we're back...




Today, I had a most interesting encounter. Going out, as routinely happens with coworkers after hours, the issue of “hate” against a particular business because of their supposed “business approach” and “unfair business practices” came up. As I listened patiently to one individual voice heartfelt complaints, I could not help but notice the individual’s actual passion behind it. This person meant what he said. But, as the list of grievances ended, I could not help myself from asking aloud if the individual in question would feel that things would be that different, should the business in question be removed from the picture altogether. The answer was not as certain and poignant as the earlier accusations.

But then another coworker intervened; someone whom I appreciate very much as a person, and I treasure as a coworker, but whose view on reality could not be further from those of yours truly. The point raised by this individual, was that this business, in addition to all the transgressions to which was held responsible by the first individual, was also accused of being involved in politics through lobbying. Then, I saw my opening.

“But of course!” I retorted. “What are you to expect from a whole system in which he who has the most money, or makes the most noise, gets to call the shots?”

“Then what would you rather have?” went the question.

“A monarchy,” I replied.

What ensued was something that I’ve encountered many a time from inert defenders of republicanism. “You only have one dick in charge then!” I was told. “As one does now?” I asked. “But it’s different!” went the answer. “People were serfs!”

“It seems that you have a rather stereotypical view of what a monarchy is,” I said. “You do know that there were monarchies across the world but in the last two hundred years, and that they were not all feudal, right?”

“You are measuring it wrong.”

At this point the first coworker, anxious to nip an ass-whooping in the bud, cut in. “You each have ten seconds to wrap it up!” he says.

“As a fact,” I continue, “the worst series of genocides, wars, and numbers of people living in poverty are occurring under governments chosen by the “will of the people.”

“You are measuring it wrong,” I was told yet again. And there the topic ended.

It seems that, some individuals (especially of leftist leanings) just cannot cope when dealing with reality and facts based in actual history. They have been so thoroughly trained to fight the “political right,” that when the option of a monarchy is presented (and supported with evidence) they freak out and shutdown.
The conversation tonight inspired me to resume my work here, and roll out a section (coming soon) that deals with basic arguments against republicanism, based on my own experience.